The Sham That Is Kamala Harris
Election Day is drawing near and some interesting things are happening. Most people would think that the two candidates would be trying to draw attention to the differences in their polices and agenda, but that is not what’s currently happening. The Democrat candidate, Kamala Harris, is in fact attempting to clone the agenda of her opponent, Donald Trump. At the time of her appointment as the Democrat party’s presidential candidate earlier this year, the image she presented to the country was one of a very progressive liberal. But over the last six months, she has attempted to adopt most of her opposition’s stances.
At her beginning, her agenda appeared to be over to the far left. She favored banning fracking as her way of appealing to the climate change portion of her party. And she also showed herself as supporting the current border policies of President Biden. But as time moved on and the polls showed she was on the wrong side of both of these issues, a shift occurred in her stances on both of these issues. She attempted to adopt the stance of Ex-President Trump. Because of the importance of the swing state of Pennsylvania, she presented herself as a supporter of fracking. And on the issue of illegals, she painted herself as being even tougher on controlling the border than Ex-President Trump.
What should concern voters is the fact that does she really hold these positions or is she just lying to the public in an attempt to garner support of Republican Party’s supporters? Can she be trusted to actually carry out what she is currently espousing?
On the fracking issue, it would seem that she is just playing with words. If she were to be elected, most likely she wouldn’t attempt to outright ban fracking. Instead, she would most likely add taxes and new regulations on fracking procedures in an attempt to making fracking become unprofitable. And because she had already tricked enough Pennsylvania voters into voting for her, it would be too late to undo the harm that she would inflict on the state’s economy.
And as to the issue of illegal immigration, her attempt to make she appear to be strong on securing the border would quickly be shown to be an outright lie. Currently when she attempts to make her case as to being tough on border control, she brings up the fact that the bipartisan House bill that was not passed by the House of Representatives because Ex-President Trump showed it to be very flawed. She blames President Trump for not securing the border. His reason was that it did not secure our border. Instead it allowed up to 5,000 illegals a day to cross to this country. That’s one point eight million illegals a year being allowed to enter this country every year. And all her talk about funding more border control agents is just smoke and mirrors. Oh yes, that money would have been spent on adding personnel at the border, but not to actually stop the flow of illegals but rather to process them quicker and allow them to leave the border and spread out into the country quicker.
And right now, Joe Biden’s DOJ is not even attempting to bring many illegals in front of an immigration judge. The illegals are being allowed to stay without vetting. This puts them in a special status whereby if they commit a crime, they are released out back in to the public, because of the special legal processing needed. So crimes of rape, murder, robbery, inflicting physical harm and many other crimes inflicted on American citizens are not being addressed.
What’s sad about this is that Kamala Harris chooses to ignore the harm that allowing unvetted illegals to be allowed to enter this country is causing. Her tough on the border stance is just a sham. And Ex-President Trump is failing too by not bringing this to the attention of the American people in a more forceful way.
The American voter had better dig deep under the surface of the persona that Vice President Harris is attempting to show them. The biased left leaning mainstream media refuses to do its job and actually reveal what is truly being said out on the campaign trail so the voter can’t just simply accept the campaign rhetoric at face value.